Review



aid classic elispot plate reader  (Cellular Technology Ltd)


Bioz Verified Symbol Cellular Technology Ltd is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Cellular Technology Ltd manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 99

    Structured Review

    Cellular Technology Ltd aid classic elispot plate reader
    Magnitude and specificity of T cell memory responses generated by 899-day infection (A) Ex vivo <t>IFNγ-ELISpot</t> well images. DMSO control unstimulated wells and wells stimulated with overlapping peptides covering S1 and S2 region of Spike (duplicates shown), or single peptides S51 and S134. (B) Total magnitude of SARS-CoV-2-specific memory T cell response to structural proteins Spike, membrane (M), nucleoprotein (NP) and open reading frame 3a (ORF3a) and RTC proteins (NSP7, NSP12 polymerase, and NSP13 helicase) colored by protein targeted and measured after persistent infection (>900 days). (C and D) Total magnitude of SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell response (C) or T cell response to Structural and RTC proteins (D) in pre-pandemic samples (pre-August 2019), in exposed healthcare workers (HCW) who remained seronegative, including abortive infections, and in HCW with laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections (samples 4 months post-exposure/infection in June to July 2020) for comparison to T cell response in persistently infected patient. (E) Ratio of the magnitude of the T cell response to RTC/structural T cells. Percentage of cohort with a response above 1 (stronger response to RTC than structural proteins) shown below. (F) Magnitude of T cell response to a pool of epitopes from Flu, EBV, and CMV. (B–E) Subset of data previously published in Swadling et al. (A–F) IFNγ-ELISpot. (C and D) Box and Whisker, Tukey. (C–F) Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis tests with Dunn’s correction. ∗ p ≤ 0.05; ∗∗ p ≤ 0.01; ∗∗∗ p ≤ 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001. (E and F) Bars, geomean.
    Aid Classic Elispot Plate Reader, supplied by Cellular Technology Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 85 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/elispot+plate+reader/S6+Universal+M2/pmc12936837-401-18-23
    Average 99 stars, based on 85 article reviews
    aid classic elispot plate reader - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    99/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Extensive evolution and T cell escape by SARS-CoV-2 in a 2.5-year persistent infection of an immunocompromised host"

    Article Title: Extensive evolution and T cell escape by SARS-CoV-2 in a 2.5-year persistent infection of an immunocompromised host

    Journal: iScience

    doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.114917

    Magnitude and specificity of T cell memory responses generated by 899-day infection (A) Ex vivo IFNγ-ELISpot well images. DMSO control unstimulated wells and wells stimulated with overlapping peptides covering S1 and S2 region of Spike (duplicates shown), or single peptides S51 and S134. (B) Total magnitude of SARS-CoV-2-specific memory T cell response to structural proteins Spike, membrane (M), nucleoprotein (NP) and open reading frame 3a (ORF3a) and RTC proteins (NSP7, NSP12 polymerase, and NSP13 helicase) colored by protein targeted and measured after persistent infection (>900 days). (C and D) Total magnitude of SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell response (C) or T cell response to Structural and RTC proteins (D) in pre-pandemic samples (pre-August 2019), in exposed healthcare workers (HCW) who remained seronegative, including abortive infections, and in HCW with laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections (samples 4 months post-exposure/infection in June to July 2020) for comparison to T cell response in persistently infected patient. (E) Ratio of the magnitude of the T cell response to RTC/structural T cells. Percentage of cohort with a response above 1 (stronger response to RTC than structural proteins) shown below. (F) Magnitude of T cell response to a pool of epitopes from Flu, EBV, and CMV. (B–E) Subset of data previously published in Swadling et al. (A–F) IFNγ-ELISpot. (C and D) Box and Whisker, Tukey. (C–F) Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis tests with Dunn’s correction. ∗ p ≤ 0.05; ∗∗ p ≤ 0.01; ∗∗∗ p ≤ 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001. (E and F) Bars, geomean.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Magnitude and specificity of T cell memory responses generated by 899-day infection (A) Ex vivo IFNγ-ELISpot well images. DMSO control unstimulated wells and wells stimulated with overlapping peptides covering S1 and S2 region of Spike (duplicates shown), or single peptides S51 and S134. (B) Total magnitude of SARS-CoV-2-specific memory T cell response to structural proteins Spike, membrane (M), nucleoprotein (NP) and open reading frame 3a (ORF3a) and RTC proteins (NSP7, NSP12 polymerase, and NSP13 helicase) colored by protein targeted and measured after persistent infection (>900 days). (C and D) Total magnitude of SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell response (C) or T cell response to Structural and RTC proteins (D) in pre-pandemic samples (pre-August 2019), in exposed healthcare workers (HCW) who remained seronegative, including abortive infections, and in HCW with laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections (samples 4 months post-exposure/infection in June to July 2020) for comparison to T cell response in persistently infected patient. (E) Ratio of the magnitude of the T cell response to RTC/structural T cells. Percentage of cohort with a response above 1 (stronger response to RTC than structural proteins) shown below. (F) Magnitude of T cell response to a pool of epitopes from Flu, EBV, and CMV. (B–E) Subset of data previously published in Swadling et al. (A–F) IFNγ-ELISpot. (C and D) Box and Whisker, Tukey. (C–F) Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis tests with Dunn’s correction. ∗ p ≤ 0.05; ∗∗ p ≤ 0.01; ∗∗∗ p ≤ 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001. (E and F) Bars, geomean.

    Techniques Used: Generated, Infection, Ex Vivo, Enzyme-linked Immunospot, Control, Membrane, Comparison, Whisker Assay

    Failure of host T cells to recognize emerging virus (A) Ex vivo magnitude of the T cell response to individual ancestral sequence peptides in which mutation arose over persistent infection by IFNγ-ELISpot. (B) Magnitude of the CD4 and CD8 T cell responses after 10-day in vitro peptide expansion with individual ancestral sequence peptides. Percentage of CD4 and CD8 producing IFNγ, TNF, or both are shown. (C) Magnitude of IFNγ+, IFNγ+TNF+, and CTV lo IFNγ+ CD4 and CD8 T cells after 8-day expansion with a pool of 12 peptides corresponding to ancestral sequence epitopes or variant sequence epitopes containing mutations in the virus isolated at day 899 of infection. (D) Magnitude of the IFNγ+TNF+ CD4 or CD8 T cell response after 10-day in vitro peptide stimulation with individual epitopes using ancestral sequence or variant sequence peptides for culture and re-stimulation on day 9. Summary data showing all T cell responses that were detectable (left) or shown for individual peptides (right) for CD4 then CD8 T cells. Duplicate and triplicate stimulations are shown for CD8 T cells for M14 and NSP2, respectively. (D) Bars, mean. Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis tests with Dunn’s correction. ∗ p ≤ 0.05; ∗∗∗ p ≤ 0.001. Peptide sequences shown in .
    Figure Legend Snippet: Failure of host T cells to recognize emerging virus (A) Ex vivo magnitude of the T cell response to individual ancestral sequence peptides in which mutation arose over persistent infection by IFNγ-ELISpot. (B) Magnitude of the CD4 and CD8 T cell responses after 10-day in vitro peptide expansion with individual ancestral sequence peptides. Percentage of CD4 and CD8 producing IFNγ, TNF, or both are shown. (C) Magnitude of IFNγ+, IFNγ+TNF+, and CTV lo IFNγ+ CD4 and CD8 T cells after 8-day expansion with a pool of 12 peptides corresponding to ancestral sequence epitopes or variant sequence epitopes containing mutations in the virus isolated at day 899 of infection. (D) Magnitude of the IFNγ+TNF+ CD4 or CD8 T cell response after 10-day in vitro peptide stimulation with individual epitopes using ancestral sequence or variant sequence peptides for culture and re-stimulation on day 9. Summary data showing all T cell responses that were detectable (left) or shown for individual peptides (right) for CD4 then CD8 T cells. Duplicate and triplicate stimulations are shown for CD8 T cells for M14 and NSP2, respectively. (D) Bars, mean. Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis tests with Dunn’s correction. ∗ p ≤ 0.05; ∗∗∗ p ≤ 0.001. Peptide sequences shown in .

    Techniques Used: Virus, Ex Vivo, Sequencing, Mutagenesis, Infection, Enzyme-linked Immunospot, In Vitro, Variant Assay, Isolation

    Related Articles

    Enzyme-linked Immunospot:

    Article Title: Development of a baculoviral CRISPR/Cas9 vector system for beta-2-microglobulin knockout in human pluripotent stem cells.
    Article Snippet: Cell therapy using derivatives of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) or human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) represents one of the most promising therapeutic approaches in regenerative medicine.. However, the transplanted cells would probably be rejected due to a mismatch in human leukocyte antigen (HLA) between donor cells and recipient’s immune cells if hESCs and hiPSCs come from genetically unrelated individuals.. Even in an autologous transplantation setting that uses the terminally differentiated progeny of hiPSCs reprogrammed from the patient’s cells, reprogramming-associated genetic aberrations could enhance the immunogenicity of the differentiated cells (Zhao et al. 2011; Martins-Taylor and Xu 2012; Pearl et al. 2012; Fu 2014).

    Article Title: Single cell and TCR analysis of immune cells from AAV gene therapy-dosed Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients
    Article Snippet: The detection antibody was removed, and the plate was washed an additional five times with DPBS, and ready-to-use TMB substrate solution (100 μL/well) was added for the plate to develop within 5 min. TMB development was stopped by washing the plate extensively with sterile ddH 2 O (Thermo Fisher). .. After washing and drying, the spots were counted using an ELISpot plate reader (CTL ImmunoSpot). ..

    Article Title: Metabolic syndrome enhances SARS-CoV-2 disease severity and reduces mRNA vaccine efficacy in a mouse model
    Article Snippet: .. Foci were counted using an ImmunoSpot CTL Elispot plate reader. ..

    Article Title: MAGE-A4 pMHC-targeted CAR-T cells exploiting TCR machinery exhibit significantly improved in vivo function while retaining antigen specificity.
    Article Snippet: After washing plates, spots were developed using streptavidin- alkaline phosphatase conjugated (Roche) and Sigmafast BICP/NBT (SigmaAldrich). .. Spots were counted using an ELISPOT Plate Reader (ImmunoSpot, CTL- Europe). .. For the T cell cytotoxicity assay, we used a non- radioactive cellular cytotoxicity assay kit (Techno Suzuta, Heiwa, Nagasaki, Japan), as previously described.11 28 According to the manufacturer’s instruction, 1×106/mL SK- MEL- 37 cells or HCT116 cells were incubated with 2.5 μL of bis(butyryloxymethyl) 4′-hydroxymethyl- 2,2′:6′,2′′-terpyridine6,6′′-dicarboxylate (BM- HT) Reagent at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 15 min.

    Article Title: Cellular and humoral immune responses in cats vaccinated with feline herpesvirus 1 modified live virus vaccine
    Article Snippet: .. The spot-forming cells (SFCs) were counted using an ELISpot plate reader (Cellular Technology Ltd., Shaker Heights, OH, United States). ..

    Article Title: Preclinical development and clinical safety assessment of a synthetic peptide conjugate enabling endogenous antibody binding to promote innate receptor engagement
    Article Snippet: .. Plates were then left to dry and the spots were quantified using an ELISpot plate reader (Cellular Technology Limited, Shaker Heights, OH, USA). ..

    Article Title: Lysosome-Associated Membrane Protein Targeting Strategy Improved Immunogenicity of Glycoprotein-Based DNA Vaccine for Marburg Virus
    Article Snippet: An HRP 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole peroxidase substrate kit (Solarbio, Beijing, China) was used for chromogenic reactions. .. The spots were counted and analyzed by an ELISpot plate reader (CTL, Cleveland, OH, USA). ..

    Article Title: Construction and evaluation of glycoprotein-based nucleic acid vaccines for Marburg virus.
    Article Snippet: Marburg virus (MARV) is a zoonotic virus that can infect humans and non-human primates (NHPs) and lead to a fatal Marburg hemorrhagic fever (MHF) [1].. The virus is a single-stranded unsegmented negative strand RNA virus, belonging to the filoviridae family [2].. Discovered by German scientists in 1967, MARV has so far led to 16 sporadic outbreaks in Africa, Europe and other places, with a mean death rate of 88%.



    Similar Products

    99
    Cellular Technology Ltd aid classic elispot plate reader
    Magnitude and specificity of T cell memory responses generated by 899-day infection (A) Ex vivo <t>IFNγ-ELISpot</t> well images. DMSO control unstimulated wells and wells stimulated with overlapping peptides covering S1 and S2 region of Spike (duplicates shown), or single peptides S51 and S134. (B) Total magnitude of SARS-CoV-2-specific memory T cell response to structural proteins Spike, membrane (M), nucleoprotein (NP) and open reading frame 3a (ORF3a) and RTC proteins (NSP7, NSP12 polymerase, and NSP13 helicase) colored by protein targeted and measured after persistent infection (>900 days). (C and D) Total magnitude of SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell response (C) or T cell response to Structural and RTC proteins (D) in pre-pandemic samples (pre-August 2019), in exposed healthcare workers (HCW) who remained seronegative, including abortive infections, and in HCW with laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections (samples 4 months post-exposure/infection in June to July 2020) for comparison to T cell response in persistently infected patient. (E) Ratio of the magnitude of the T cell response to RTC/structural T cells. Percentage of cohort with a response above 1 (stronger response to RTC than structural proteins) shown below. (F) Magnitude of T cell response to a pool of epitopes from Flu, EBV, and CMV. (B–E) Subset of data previously published in Swadling et al. (A–F) IFNγ-ELISpot. (C and D) Box and Whisker, Tukey. (C–F) Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis tests with Dunn’s correction. ∗ p ≤ 0.05; ∗∗ p ≤ 0.01; ∗∗∗ p ≤ 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001. (E and F) Bars, geomean.
    Aid Classic Elispot Plate Reader, supplied by Cellular Technology Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/elispot+plate+reader/S6+Universal+M2/pmc12936837-401-18-23
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    aid classic elispot plate reader - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    Cellular Technology Ltd ctl immunospot s6 elispot plate reader
    Magnitude and specificity of T cell memory responses generated by 899-day infection (A) Ex vivo <t>IFNγ-ELISpot</t> well images. DMSO control unstimulated wells and wells stimulated with overlapping peptides covering S1 and S2 region of Spike (duplicates shown), or single peptides S51 and S134. (B) Total magnitude of SARS-CoV-2-specific memory T cell response to structural proteins Spike, membrane (M), nucleoprotein (NP) and open reading frame 3a (ORF3a) and RTC proteins (NSP7, NSP12 polymerase, and NSP13 helicase) colored by protein targeted and measured after persistent infection (>900 days). (C and D) Total magnitude of SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell response (C) or T cell response to Structural and RTC proteins (D) in pre-pandemic samples (pre-August 2019), in exposed healthcare workers (HCW) who remained seronegative, including abortive infections, and in HCW with laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections (samples 4 months post-exposure/infection in June to July 2020) for comparison to T cell response in persistently infected patient. (E) Ratio of the magnitude of the T cell response to RTC/structural T cells. Percentage of cohort with a response above 1 (stronger response to RTC than structural proteins) shown below. (F) Magnitude of T cell response to a pool of epitopes from Flu, EBV, and CMV. (B–E) Subset of data previously published in Swadling et al. (A–F) IFNγ-ELISpot. (C and D) Box and Whisker, Tukey. (C–F) Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis tests with Dunn’s correction. ∗ p ≤ 0.05; ∗∗ p ≤ 0.01; ∗∗∗ p ≤ 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001. (E and F) Bars, geomean.
    Ctl Immunospot S6 Elispot Plate Reader, supplied by Cellular Technology Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/elispot+plate+reader/ImmunoSpot+Software/us12478667-917-10-10
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ctl immunospot s6 elispot plate reader - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Mabtech Inc elispot plate reader
    Magnitude and specificity of T cell memory responses generated by 899-day infection (A) Ex vivo <t>IFNγ-ELISpot</t> well images. DMSO control unstimulated wells and wells stimulated with overlapping peptides covering S1 and S2 region of Spike (duplicates shown), or single peptides S51 and S134. (B) Total magnitude of SARS-CoV-2-specific memory T cell response to structural proteins Spike, membrane (M), nucleoprotein (NP) and open reading frame 3a (ORF3a) and RTC proteins (NSP7, NSP12 polymerase, and NSP13 helicase) colored by protein targeted and measured after persistent infection (>900 days). (C and D) Total magnitude of SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell response (C) or T cell response to Structural and RTC proteins (D) in pre-pandemic samples (pre-August 2019), in exposed healthcare workers (HCW) who remained seronegative, including abortive infections, and in HCW with laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections (samples 4 months post-exposure/infection in June to July 2020) for comparison to T cell response in persistently infected patient. (E) Ratio of the magnitude of the T cell response to RTC/structural T cells. Percentage of cohort with a response above 1 (stronger response to RTC than structural proteins) shown below. (F) Magnitude of T cell response to a pool of epitopes from Flu, EBV, and CMV. (B–E) Subset of data previously published in Swadling et al. (A–F) IFNγ-ELISpot. (C and D) Box and Whisker, Tukey. (C–F) Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis tests with Dunn’s correction. ∗ p ≤ 0.05; ∗∗ p ≤ 0.01; ∗∗∗ p ≤ 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001. (E and F) Bars, geomean.
    Elispot Plate Reader, supplied by Mabtech Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/elispot+plate+reader/elispot+fluorospot+iris+mabtech+reader/pm41205400-177-18-21
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    elispot plate reader - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Mabtech Inc iris elispot plate reader
    Magnitude and specificity of T cell memory responses generated by 899-day infection (A) Ex vivo <t>IFNγ-ELISpot</t> well images. DMSO control unstimulated wells and wells stimulated with overlapping peptides covering S1 and S2 region of Spike (duplicates shown), or single peptides S51 and S134. (B) Total magnitude of SARS-CoV-2-specific memory T cell response to structural proteins Spike, membrane (M), nucleoprotein (NP) and open reading frame 3a (ORF3a) and RTC proteins (NSP7, NSP12 polymerase, and NSP13 helicase) colored by protein targeted and measured after persistent infection (>900 days). (C and D) Total magnitude of SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell response (C) or T cell response to Structural and RTC proteins (D) in pre-pandemic samples (pre-August 2019), in exposed healthcare workers (HCW) who remained seronegative, including abortive infections, and in HCW with laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections (samples 4 months post-exposure/infection in June to July 2020) for comparison to T cell response in persistently infected patient. (E) Ratio of the magnitude of the T cell response to RTC/structural T cells. Percentage of cohort with a response above 1 (stronger response to RTC than structural proteins) shown below. (F) Magnitude of T cell response to a pool of epitopes from Flu, EBV, and CMV. (B–E) Subset of data previously published in Swadling et al. (A–F) IFNγ-ELISpot. (C and D) Box and Whisker, Tukey. (C–F) Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis tests with Dunn’s correction. ∗ p ≤ 0.05; ∗∗ p ≤ 0.01; ∗∗∗ p ≤ 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001. (E and F) Bars, geomean.
    Iris Elispot Plate Reader, supplied by Mabtech Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/elispot+plate+reader/elispot+fluorospot+iris+mabtech+reader/pmc12010439-600-7-6
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    iris elispot plate reader - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    Cellular Technology Ltd s6 fluorocore m2 elispot plate reader
    Spontaneous IgM secretion by tonsil and appendix B cells. ( A ) Representative images of <t>ELISpot</t> wells for spontaneous IgM secretion by tonsil and appendix IgM + B cell subpopulations after 6 h of incubation. ( B ) Quantification of ELISpot data from tonsil (left) and appendix (right). Each dot represents a single subject. Results are presented as mean ± SEM; two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test, * P < 0.05. Gating strategy for cell sorting (Supplementary Fig. 5). Population purity > 97%.
    S6 Fluorocore M2 Elispot Plate Reader, supplied by Cellular Technology Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/elispot+plate+reader/S6+FluoroCore+M2/pmc12284196-228-16-22
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    s6 fluorocore m2 elispot plate reader - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    AID Diagnostika elispot plate reader
    HIP CAR T cells do not induce an allogeneic immune response in NZB/W lupus mice (A) One million WT or HIP CAR T cells were intravenously injected into fully allogeneic NZB/W lupus mice and the host immune response was quantified after 6 days. CD8 T cells were recovered from the spleen of these mice, NK cells and macrophages were taken from C57BL/6 mice, and IgM and IgG donor CAR T cell-specific antibodies (DSA) were quantified. (B) <t>Interferon-γ</t> <t>(IFN-γ)</t> <t>ELISpot</t> assays were performed with CD8 lymphocytes isolated from the NZB/W recipients and the injected WT or HIP CAR T cells as stimulators. Spot frequencies were automatically enumerated (5 animals per group, all single animals are shown, mean ± SD, Mann-Whitney test). (C) Impedance cytotoxicity assays with WT and or HIP CAR T cells as targets and isolated CD8 lymphocytes from the lupus mice as effector cells (5 animals per group, mean ± SD per time point). The cell index is normalized at time point zero hours and a drop of the curve indicates target cell killing, while a stable signal indicates target cell survival. Fluctuations in the first few hours reflect cell culture perturbations from the addition of the effector cells. (D) IgM and IgG DSAs were quantified by flow cytometry (5 animals per group, all single animals are shown, mean ± SD, Mann-Whitney test). The background of this assay is shown in a dashed line. (E and F) Impedance cytotoxicity assays with WT or HIP CAR T cells or MHC class I and II-deficient double knockout (DKO) cells as targets and C57BL/6 NK cells (E) or macrophages (Mac; F) as effector cells (5 animals per group, mean ± SD per time point).
    Elispot Plate Reader, supplied by AID Diagnostika, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/elispot+plate+reader/elispot+reader/pmc12221509-365-24-27
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    elispot plate reader - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Magnitude and specificity of T cell memory responses generated by 899-day infection (A) Ex vivo IFNγ-ELISpot well images. DMSO control unstimulated wells and wells stimulated with overlapping peptides covering S1 and S2 region of Spike (duplicates shown), or single peptides S51 and S134. (B) Total magnitude of SARS-CoV-2-specific memory T cell response to structural proteins Spike, membrane (M), nucleoprotein (NP) and open reading frame 3a (ORF3a) and RTC proteins (NSP7, NSP12 polymerase, and NSP13 helicase) colored by protein targeted and measured after persistent infection (>900 days). (C and D) Total magnitude of SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell response (C) or T cell response to Structural and RTC proteins (D) in pre-pandemic samples (pre-August 2019), in exposed healthcare workers (HCW) who remained seronegative, including abortive infections, and in HCW with laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections (samples 4 months post-exposure/infection in June to July 2020) for comparison to T cell response in persistently infected patient. (E) Ratio of the magnitude of the T cell response to RTC/structural T cells. Percentage of cohort with a response above 1 (stronger response to RTC than structural proteins) shown below. (F) Magnitude of T cell response to a pool of epitopes from Flu, EBV, and CMV. (B–E) Subset of data previously published in Swadling et al. (A–F) IFNγ-ELISpot. (C and D) Box and Whisker, Tukey. (C–F) Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis tests with Dunn’s correction. ∗ p ≤ 0.05; ∗∗ p ≤ 0.01; ∗∗∗ p ≤ 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001. (E and F) Bars, geomean.

    Journal: iScience

    Article Title: Extensive evolution and T cell escape by SARS-CoV-2 in a 2.5-year persistent infection of an immunocompromised host

    doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.114917

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Magnitude and specificity of T cell memory responses generated by 899-day infection (A) Ex vivo IFNγ-ELISpot well images. DMSO control unstimulated wells and wells stimulated with overlapping peptides covering S1 and S2 region of Spike (duplicates shown), or single peptides S51 and S134. (B) Total magnitude of SARS-CoV-2-specific memory T cell response to structural proteins Spike, membrane (M), nucleoprotein (NP) and open reading frame 3a (ORF3a) and RTC proteins (NSP7, NSP12 polymerase, and NSP13 helicase) colored by protein targeted and measured after persistent infection (>900 days). (C and D) Total magnitude of SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell response (C) or T cell response to Structural and RTC proteins (D) in pre-pandemic samples (pre-August 2019), in exposed healthcare workers (HCW) who remained seronegative, including abortive infections, and in HCW with laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections (samples 4 months post-exposure/infection in June to July 2020) for comparison to T cell response in persistently infected patient. (E) Ratio of the magnitude of the T cell response to RTC/structural T cells. Percentage of cohort with a response above 1 (stronger response to RTC than structural proteins) shown below. (F) Magnitude of T cell response to a pool of epitopes from Flu, EBV, and CMV. (B–E) Subset of data previously published in Swadling et al. (A–F) IFNγ-ELISpot. (C and D) Box and Whisker, Tukey. (C–F) Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis tests with Dunn’s correction. ∗ p ≤ 0.05; ∗∗ p ≤ 0.01; ∗∗∗ p ≤ 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001. (E and F) Bars, geomean.

    Article Snippet: Plates were washed in double-distilled H 2 O and left to dry overnight before being read on the AID classic ELISpot plate reader (Immunospot S6 Universal M2 ELISpot Reader).

    Techniques: Generated, Infection, Ex Vivo, Enzyme-linked Immunospot, Control, Membrane, Comparison, Whisker Assay

    Failure of host T cells to recognize emerging virus (A) Ex vivo magnitude of the T cell response to individual ancestral sequence peptides in which mutation arose over persistent infection by IFNγ-ELISpot. (B) Magnitude of the CD4 and CD8 T cell responses after 10-day in vitro peptide expansion with individual ancestral sequence peptides. Percentage of CD4 and CD8 producing IFNγ, TNF, or both are shown. (C) Magnitude of IFNγ+, IFNγ+TNF+, and CTV lo IFNγ+ CD4 and CD8 T cells after 8-day expansion with a pool of 12 peptides corresponding to ancestral sequence epitopes or variant sequence epitopes containing mutations in the virus isolated at day 899 of infection. (D) Magnitude of the IFNγ+TNF+ CD4 or CD8 T cell response after 10-day in vitro peptide stimulation with individual epitopes using ancestral sequence or variant sequence peptides for culture and re-stimulation on day 9. Summary data showing all T cell responses that were detectable (left) or shown for individual peptides (right) for CD4 then CD8 T cells. Duplicate and triplicate stimulations are shown for CD8 T cells for M14 and NSP2, respectively. (D) Bars, mean. Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis tests with Dunn’s correction. ∗ p ≤ 0.05; ∗∗∗ p ≤ 0.001. Peptide sequences shown in .

    Journal: iScience

    Article Title: Extensive evolution and T cell escape by SARS-CoV-2 in a 2.5-year persistent infection of an immunocompromised host

    doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.114917

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Failure of host T cells to recognize emerging virus (A) Ex vivo magnitude of the T cell response to individual ancestral sequence peptides in which mutation arose over persistent infection by IFNγ-ELISpot. (B) Magnitude of the CD4 and CD8 T cell responses after 10-day in vitro peptide expansion with individual ancestral sequence peptides. Percentage of CD4 and CD8 producing IFNγ, TNF, or both are shown. (C) Magnitude of IFNγ+, IFNγ+TNF+, and CTV lo IFNγ+ CD4 and CD8 T cells after 8-day expansion with a pool of 12 peptides corresponding to ancestral sequence epitopes or variant sequence epitopes containing mutations in the virus isolated at day 899 of infection. (D) Magnitude of the IFNγ+TNF+ CD4 or CD8 T cell response after 10-day in vitro peptide stimulation with individual epitopes using ancestral sequence or variant sequence peptides for culture and re-stimulation on day 9. Summary data showing all T cell responses that were detectable (left) or shown for individual peptides (right) for CD4 then CD8 T cells. Duplicate and triplicate stimulations are shown for CD8 T cells for M14 and NSP2, respectively. (D) Bars, mean. Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis tests with Dunn’s correction. ∗ p ≤ 0.05; ∗∗∗ p ≤ 0.001. Peptide sequences shown in .

    Article Snippet: Plates were washed in double-distilled H 2 O and left to dry overnight before being read on the AID classic ELISpot plate reader (Immunospot S6 Universal M2 ELISpot Reader).

    Techniques: Virus, Ex Vivo, Sequencing, Mutagenesis, Infection, Enzyme-linked Immunospot, In Vitro, Variant Assay, Isolation

    Spontaneous IgM secretion by tonsil and appendix B cells. ( A ) Representative images of ELISpot wells for spontaneous IgM secretion by tonsil and appendix IgM + B cell subpopulations after 6 h of incubation. ( B ) Quantification of ELISpot data from tonsil (left) and appendix (right). Each dot represents a single subject. Results are presented as mean ± SEM; two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test, * P < 0.05. Gating strategy for cell sorting (Supplementary Fig. 5). Population purity > 97%.

    Journal: Scientific Reports

    Article Title: IgM + IgD − B cells in human gut-associated lymphoid tissue have memory features and give rise to IgM + and IgA + antibody-secreting cells

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-11209-1

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Spontaneous IgM secretion by tonsil and appendix B cells. ( A ) Representative images of ELISpot wells for spontaneous IgM secretion by tonsil and appendix IgM + B cell subpopulations after 6 h of incubation. ( B ) Quantification of ELISpot data from tonsil (left) and appendix (right). Each dot represents a single subject. Results are presented as mean ± SEM; two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test, * P < 0.05. Gating strategy for cell sorting (Supplementary Fig. 5). Population purity > 97%.

    Article Snippet: Spots were developed using the HRP substrate - TMB (MABTECH- Cat: 3651-10) and counted using an S6 FluoroCore M2 ELISpot plate reader (ImmunoSpot, CTL).

    Techniques: Enzyme-linked Immunospot, Incubation, Two Tailed Test, FACS

    HIP CAR T cells do not induce an allogeneic immune response in NZB/W lupus mice (A) One million WT or HIP CAR T cells were intravenously injected into fully allogeneic NZB/W lupus mice and the host immune response was quantified after 6 days. CD8 T cells were recovered from the spleen of these mice, NK cells and macrophages were taken from C57BL/6 mice, and IgM and IgG donor CAR T cell-specific antibodies (DSA) were quantified. (B) Interferon-γ (IFN-γ) ELISpot assays were performed with CD8 lymphocytes isolated from the NZB/W recipients and the injected WT or HIP CAR T cells as stimulators. Spot frequencies were automatically enumerated (5 animals per group, all single animals are shown, mean ± SD, Mann-Whitney test). (C) Impedance cytotoxicity assays with WT and or HIP CAR T cells as targets and isolated CD8 lymphocytes from the lupus mice as effector cells (5 animals per group, mean ± SD per time point). The cell index is normalized at time point zero hours and a drop of the curve indicates target cell killing, while a stable signal indicates target cell survival. Fluctuations in the first few hours reflect cell culture perturbations from the addition of the effector cells. (D) IgM and IgG DSAs were quantified by flow cytometry (5 animals per group, all single animals are shown, mean ± SD, Mann-Whitney test). The background of this assay is shown in a dashed line. (E and F) Impedance cytotoxicity assays with WT or HIP CAR T cells or MHC class I and II-deficient double knockout (DKO) cells as targets and C57BL/6 NK cells (E) or macrophages (Mac; F) as effector cells (5 animals per group, mean ± SD per time point).

    Journal: iScience

    Article Title: Hypoimmune CD19 CAR T cells treat allogeneic mice with features of spontaneous systemic lupus erythematosus

    doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.112806

    Figure Lengend Snippet: HIP CAR T cells do not induce an allogeneic immune response in NZB/W lupus mice (A) One million WT or HIP CAR T cells were intravenously injected into fully allogeneic NZB/W lupus mice and the host immune response was quantified after 6 days. CD8 T cells were recovered from the spleen of these mice, NK cells and macrophages were taken from C57BL/6 mice, and IgM and IgG donor CAR T cell-specific antibodies (DSA) were quantified. (B) Interferon-γ (IFN-γ) ELISpot assays were performed with CD8 lymphocytes isolated from the NZB/W recipients and the injected WT or HIP CAR T cells as stimulators. Spot frequencies were automatically enumerated (5 animals per group, all single animals are shown, mean ± SD, Mann-Whitney test). (C) Impedance cytotoxicity assays with WT and or HIP CAR T cells as targets and isolated CD8 lymphocytes from the lupus mice as effector cells (5 animals per group, mean ± SD per time point). The cell index is normalized at time point zero hours and a drop of the curve indicates target cell killing, while a stable signal indicates target cell survival. Fluctuations in the first few hours reflect cell culture perturbations from the addition of the effector cells. (D) IgM and IgG DSAs were quantified by flow cytometry (5 animals per group, all single animals are shown, mean ± SD, Mann-Whitney test). The background of this assay is shown in a dashed line. (E and F) Impedance cytotoxicity assays with WT or HIP CAR T cells or MHC class I and II-deficient double knockout (DKO) cells as targets and C57BL/6 NK cells (E) or macrophages (Mac; F) as effector cells (5 animals per group, mean ± SD per time point).

    Article Snippet: One hundred thousand stimulator cells were incubated with one million recipient responder splenocytes for 24 h and IFN-γ spot frequencies were enumerated using an Elispot plate reader (AID Diagnostika GmbH, Strassburg, Germany).

    Techniques: Injection, Enzyme-linked Immunospot, Isolation, MANN-WHITNEY, Cell Culture, Flow Cytometry, Double Knockout